Your AI Content Now Has to Confess It's Fake
AI Governance

Your AI Content Now Has to Confess It's Fake

Since August 2, publishing AI deepfakes or synthetic content to EU audiences without a label is against the law. Part 2 of our series: what to label, what's exempt, and how.

AI Compliance, One Rule at a Time, Part 2 of the series This is the second in our weekly series taking one rule of AI regulation at a time and explaining, in plain language, what it means and how to comply. Last week we covered chatbot disclosure. This week: if you publish AI-generated content, especially deepfakes, you now have to label it. This is an explainer, not legal advice, and the law is still evolving, so confirm specifics with a qualified professional before acting.
The rule this week

Since August 2, 2026, if you publish AI-generated content to people in the EU, you must clearly label two things: deepfakes (realistic AI-made or altered images, audio, or video), and AI-written text on matters of public interest that had no human editorial review. This comes from Article 50 of the EU AI Act. It applies to the business publishing the content, not just whoever built the AI, and it reaches you wherever you are based if your audience is in the EU. Labelling new deepfakes is required now, with no grace period.

Last week we looked at the rule that your chatbot has to tell people it is AI. This week's rule is its close cousin, and it matters to anyone who creates content: marketers, agencies, media, and creators. If your work involves AI-generated images, video, audio, or certain kinds of text, you now have a duty to make that AI involvement visible to your audience. Let us break down exactly what has to be labelled, what does not, and how to do it.

What the rule actually says

Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires that AI-generated content be disclosed as such, so that people are not misled into thinking something artificial is real. The obligation focuses on two specific categories. The first is deepfakes, defined as AI-generated or manipulated images, audio, or video that resemble real people, objects, or events and could falsely appear authentic. If you publish one, you must clearly disclose that it is artificially generated or manipulated. The second is AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest, which must be disclosed as AI-generated unless a human took editorial responsibility for it.

The duty falls on the deployer, meaning the organisation that professionally publishes the content and puts it in front of people, whether or not you built the underlying AI. So a marketing team using a third-party tool to generate a realistic video of a person is responsible for labelling it, even though they did not build the model.

The timing detail that trips people up:

There are two separate deadlines here, and confusing them is a common mistake. The duty to label new deepfakes and public-interest text, the part most businesses need to act on, applies now, since August 2, 2026, with no grace period for content you create from that date. A separate, more technical obligation on the providers who build generative AI systems, to embed machine-readable marks like watermarks, has a grace period until December 2, 2026, for systems already on the market, with detection interoperability due by February 2027. In short: if you publish AI content, your labelling duty is live today. Content you made before August 2 does not need retroactive labelling.

Who has to comply

This applies to any business or individual professionally publishing AI-generated content to an audience that includes people in the EU. If you run marketing campaigns with AI-generated visuals, produce media with synthetic voices or avatars, create AI video for clients, or publish AI-written articles on current affairs, you are in scope. As with every part of the AI Act, geography does not exempt you: a business based anywhere in the world is caught whenever its AI-generated content reaches people in the EU. This is the same extraterritorial reach, the Brussels Effect, that runs through the whole regulation.

What compliance actually looks like

The disclosure has to be clear and noticeable to the person seeing the content. For a deepfake video, that means a visible on-screen label or an opening disclaimer; for images, a visible mark; for audio, an audible or clearly stated disclosure. To make this easier, the European Commission has published three official, free-to-use icons, a basic AI mark, a "fully AI-generated" mark, and a "partially AI-modified" mark, available in standard image formats with no attribution required. Commission testing found that pairing an icon with a short text label improves recognition on every measure, so the recommended approach is icon plus a few words, not an icon alone.

There are sensible carve-outs worth knowing. Content that is evidently artistic, creative, satirical, or fictional attracts only a minimal, non-intrusive disclosure rather than a prominent one, so a label does not have to ruin the creative work. Clearly fantastical or physically impossible content, a dragon, a person flying unaided, falls outside the deepfake definition altogether. And AI-assisted text escapes the labelling duty where it went through genuine human editorial review with a named person taking responsibility for the publication.

What is at stake

The penalties mirror the rest of the transparency rules: non-compliance can draw fines of up to 15 million euros or 3 percent of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, with a lower figure applied proportionally to smaller businesses. Enforcement sits with national market surveillance authorities across the EU. Beyond the fine, there is a trust dimension: audiences increasingly expect transparency about AI, and being caught publishing unlabelled deepfakes carries a reputational cost that can outlast any penalty. Labelling is quickly becoming both a legal duty and a mark of credibility.

Your action this week

Here is the step to take. Make a list of every place your business publishes AI-generated content externally, marketing visuals, social media, video, audio, and any AI-written public-interest text. For each, ask two questions: is this a deepfake or realistic synthetic media, and if it is text, did a human take editorial responsibility? Where the answer means a label is required, add a clear disclosure now, ideally one of the official EU icons paired with a short text note. If you use third-party AI tools, remember the labelling duty sits with you, the publisher, not just the tool. This small step keeps you compliant and, increasingly, signals credibility to your audience. Next week, we look at how to classify your AI system into the right risk tier, the step that determines which of the heavier rules apply to you at all.

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to label AI-generated images and videos?

If they are deepfakes, realistic AI-generated or altered images, audio, or video resembling real people or events, and you publish them to an EU audience, yes. Since August 2, 2026, Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires clear disclosure that the content is artificially generated or manipulated. Clearly fantastical content, like a dragon, falls outside the definition, and artistic or satirical work needs only minimal disclosure.

Does this apply to AI-written text too?

For some text, yes. AI-generated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest must be disclosed as AI-generated, unless a human took genuine editorial responsibility for it. Everyday AI-assisted writing that goes through real human review, or that is not about matters of public interest, generally falls outside the duty.

I use a third-party AI tool. Who is responsible for labelling?

You are, as the publisher. The labelling duty under Article 50(4) falls on the deployer, the organisation that professionally puts the content in front of people, whether or not you built the AI. So if you generate a realistic video with someone else's tool and publish it, the responsibility to label it is yours.

Is there a grace period for this rule?

Not for the labelling of new content. The duty to label new deepfakes and public-interest text applies now, since August 2, 2026. A separate, more technical machine-readable marking obligation on the providers who build generative systems has a grace period until December 2, 2026, for systems already on the market. Content you created before August 2 does not need retroactive labelling.

How am I supposed to label it?

Clearly and noticeably to the viewer: a visible on-screen label or opening disclaimer for video, a visible mark for images, a stated disclosure for audio. The European Commission has published three official, free icons for AI-generated content, and its testing showed that pairing an icon with a short text label works best. An icon plus a few plain words is the recommended approach.

Follow the series, get compliant one rule at a time

This is Part 2 of our weekly guide to AI regulation, breaking down one rule at a time so compliance feels manageable instead of overwhelming. Explore more clear, honest guides on AISetApp and follow along each week.

Explore more on AISetApp
Sources and further reading
  1. European Commission, Guidelines on Article 50 of the EU AI Act and the Code of Practice on Marking and Labelling of AI-Generated Content, 2026
  2. EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Article 50(2) and 50(4) transparency and labelling obligations
  3. Paul Weiss and Bratby Law analyses of the final Article 50 transparency rules and deadlines, 2026
  4. EdenAI and AI Ethics Assessor practical guides to labelling AI-generated content and the official EU icons, 2026

Reviewed August 2026. This is an explainer, not legal advice. The law is evolving; verify specifics with a qualified professional before acting.

Researched and drafted with AI assistance, reviewed and edited by Yasser El Hardouz, who takes editorial responsibility for this article.